I think there should be a limit on how many billions each person can have, then the surplus money should be spent by a non-corrupt organisation to make sure no child under the age of 16 on this planet ever goes hungry because there is not enough food in their house.
My inner so
cialist agrees with you, but my inner capitalist wonders where you would draw the line. :question:
I see corporate CEOs receiving—not
earning, mind you, but receiving nonetheless—ten, twenty,
forty million in yearly compensation, and it sickens me. Nobody needs that kind of scratch to survive in this world—
nobody—and nobody's worth it, no matter their qualifications. If their personal expenses are so over the top and out of control that they require anywhere near that amount, they shouldn't be put in charge of companies funded by other people's money in the first place. Year after year, shareholders vote to approve these outrageous packages (reducing their own dividends in the process), and year after year, the executives gobble them up and ask for more.
Why does it cost so much to fund the military? Why is healthcare so expensive? You can ask a dozen different questions along those lines, and the answer will be the same: corporate greed. It starves the poor and rapes the planet while a few fat f
ucks pile up more dough than any normal, sane, responsible person could spend in ten lifetimes.
What can we do about it, though? At least in the U.S., the law protects and supports this insanity. Corporations are "people" now, absurd as that sounds. They make enormous contributions to political parties and candidates, guaranteeing that their voices will be heard over the feeble complaints of the little people who oppose them. They are as much a part of our government as Congress and the President and just as powerful, if not more so. Barring a new revolution (perhaps worldwide), I don't see how things will ever change.