I have to say, I think women in the military is a bad idea... Just as I think men in the military is a bad idea... The vast majority of people who are killed in combat situations are completely innocent, it's almost never the leaders or the people giving the orders who lose their lives... Signing up to the military means you're signing up potentially to kill other innocent people.
Sorry to go off subject, but I felt like pushing my pacifistic views a little... I hate war... It's a tragic, terrible waste of life. If everyone refused to fight, there could be no wars...
If Gandhi and his followers stood in the way of Hitler's, Hitler's would have won. I wouldn't join any kind of military because it's not in me to harm another person, but evil must be confronted with force. Sometimes reason and good intentions aren't enough. As for women in the military, read my post above.
Why was the war department renamed to department of defense? Seems as if they got the idea from George Orwell's 1984 newspeak, giving ministries misleading titles. Since changing the name, the US military has waged more offensive campaigns than before and not even in the name of defense. I joined because I had no other means of making money where I live and they made promises of paying for college, I joine the Military Police as they offered me a substantial bonus and told me I would only do police duties and not see combat. That was fiction of course, but by the time I found that out I was in a combat support MP unit. I will not kill another person, so I share your pacifism. Have you ever read the book Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau? Personally, I would like to see the military budget slashed so we might invest in real advancement in education, health and scientific advancement. If something like Starfleet existed, I would be the first in line to join that.
Indeed, the "Department of Defence" is a laughable name, all things considered. Also I agree with your stance on the military budget being used to fund more worthwhile areas.
No, I haven't read the essay, but I've downloaded A PDF of it to read soon.
If Gandhi and his followers stood in the way of Hitler's, Hitler's would have won. I wouldn't join any kind of military because it's not in me to harm another person, but evil must be confronted with force. Sometimes reason and good intentions aren't enough. As for women in the military, read my post above.
If "Gandhi and his followers" had been in the German army and refused to use violence in the first place then there couldn't have been a war. People in armies are innocent people following orders (generally speaking), in fighting army against army it is innocent people being killed. You want to use force against evil? By all means, attack the source of evil, not the innocent order-followers.
Of course, this is an idealist stance, and not one I believe will occur (or indeed is possible to occur in a world such as this), but nonetheless...
If Gandhi and his followers stood in the way of Hitler's, Hitler's would have won. I wouldn't join any kind of military because it's not in me to harm another person, but evil must be confronted with force. Sometimes reason and good intentions aren't enough. As for women in the military, read my post above.
the hope is that having a large, well-trained, well-equipped military will prevent other nations from wanting to wage war against us, thereby ensuring peace
sadly, that doesn't seem to dissuade everyone
so someone has to be trained and ready to fight if and when the need arises
no one wants to kill or risk being killed - least of all the people in the military
most people who join the military do so because they would rather be the ones to have to do the dirty work and get in harm's way instead of having it fall on the shoulders of their families, friends, or neighbors - it's a sacrifice they make willingly so that others won't have to
Alex Hatfield, an Army enlisted man serving in Vilseck, Germany, said he has concerns. “Women pose an emotional conundrum to men,” he said. “Everyone knows it. We don’t understand how women think, what they feel or why.”
and this:
Army Spc. Heather Wood, who was in Afghanistan in 2010 as a military police officer, said qualified women should be allowed the opportunity. “They should be allowed to do what they want,” she said. “Heck, there are males out there that can’t handle being shot at.”
I read 300,000 women have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan from roadside bombs. Why send more people into war to murder people they dont know.
'On average, a US military veteran commits suicide every 80 minutes, according to recent estimates from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Department. At the same time, suicides by active soldiers increased 15 percent in 2012, to a new record.
According to these figures, more soldiers and veterans take their own lives every year than have been killed in action throughout the last twelve years of Afghanistan and the last ten years of Iraq combined'.
Wars are fought purely to make massive profits for arms corporations. Henry Kissingeer saud himself 'Military men are dumb pawns'. Also Amcerica uses depleted uranium in their weapons even though it is illegal under international law.
the hope is that having a large, well-trained, well-equipped military will prevent other nations from wanting to wage war against us, thereby ensuring peace
That is unless of course a nations military is the initial aggressor.
I am not supportive of these current conflicts, I protested against Australian troops being involved in war on Iraq, and so it follows that I don't support women being involved in combat roles in them.
I am not supportive of these current conflicts, I protested against Australian troops being involved in war on Iraq, and so it follows that I don't support women being involved in combat roles in them.
For me, it does not follow. I am not supportive of what's been going on in Iraq/Afghanistan either. I am supportive of women having the right to choose to take combat roles if they wish.
Hope I don't seem like I'm just wanting to argue with you tonight--I'm not, really!
That is unless of course a nations military is the initial aggressor.
Not naming names or anything.
"who started it?" is always a matter of debate
you don't have to support the politics of a particular administration (which has subsequently been peacefully voted out of office by a fully functioning democratic system) to see the merits of maintaining a standing military
you don't have to support the politics of a particular administration (which has subsequently been peacefully voted out of office by a fully functioning democratic system) to see the merits of maintaining a standing military
they are not the same argument
I never said they were.
"Who started it" however is extremely relevant nevertheless.
I always find it amusing how so called peaceful countries really are in fact - not so peaceful.
Why do my comments always be ignored.
War is fought to make money for big business here is a brilliant documentary about how war is about profit Dealers in Death | Watch Free Documentary Online 35 minutes if you have the time. john pilger did a brilliant documentary about the arms trade.Flying the Flag: Arming the World | Watch Free Documentary Online Most of the weapons are produced by western corporations,
shut down the arms corporastions that is how we will have world peace.
For me, it does not follow. I am not supportive of what's been going on in Iraq/Afghanistan either. I am supportive of women having the right to choose to take combat roles if they wish.
Hope I don't seem like I'm just wanting to argue with you tonight--I'm not, really!
No need to argue, it is a difference of opinion.
Australian women are already able to serve in combat roles.
#21
Report
