After reading Neuromancer... what the **** did I just read?
I suppose I know the basic outline. But the details are... hazy. APPARENTLY Gibson writes masterfully and has a certain style that is supposed to be amazing, but as some reviewers on Goodreads said, he gives too much setting detail and his descriptions are bizarre. I suppose science fiction is bizarre, though, and his story is bizarre in general.
Being an English major feels like a lot of guessing, over-analyzing - pulling crap out of your rear, basically, and as long as it's the same crap the majority of the "scholars" pulled out of theirs, you're golden. Golden crap.
Sorry for the crude metaphor.