Men and Women are aparantly not equal.

Oh god, rehashing this stuff again? -___-

Well, no one needs (or wants) to hear my opinion on it - it just makes people angry :D (which I find pretty funny, as well as frustrating).
 

Etbow23

Well-known member
Hm, if there were only woman leaders around the world, wouldn't the world be more peaceful? Men are the ones who commit like 95% of the murders, rapes, and genocides..and start 100% of the wars...and commit the all of the mass shootings that have been happening..
 

Nathália

Well-known member
I think that's due to the culture of society, no one is born violent. Maybe there needs to be more things set up to help men in the world, but some men feel so ashamed to get help because they can feel that it emasculates them and in certain cultures mental health is still taboo.

I don't see why we have to put a whole sex down and point the fingers at them for what's wrong in the world. I know men who are the sweetest thing and then I know females who are just evil witches and the other way around.

People use that same (if) argument on people due to their race/ethnicity, so why is it okay to say that world would be better without men because they have a penis same thing for women.
 

Etbow23

Well-known member
I'm not saying the world would be better without men. But, we can't ignore the facts. If it's okay to say men would be better as president, isn't it fair to discuss the opposite..?
 
Last edited:
a7c58acc2569c357a0ebee46b467ffad.gif



it just never stops does it? :eek:h:
 
Oh, I'm not saying the world would be better without men. But, we can't ignore the facts. If it's okay to say men would be better as president, isn't it fair to discuss the opposite..?

It isn't fair to say that men would make better presidents, though. And vice versa. Because that's extremely prejudges. One's gender isn't their personality. Character (and therefore beneficial traits for a position of high influence) is a individual thing, and varies for ever single person, male and female alike.
 

Etbow23

Well-known member
Right, but people on this post have agreed with the video, and no one gets mad?? It's funny people get so bent out of shape when I make such a "wild" proposal...

I personally do not take either stance. But people start trippin when I make the opposite suggestion! funny..
 

Nathália

Well-known member
I'm not saying the world would be better without men. But, we can't ignore the facts. If it's okay to say men would be better as president, isn't it fair to discuss the opposite..?

Another thing I'd like to add is that in terms of race/ethnicity, people are allowed to trash one race without any problem. In my core learning classes at college for "american experience" or "dilemmas," we typically do learn about how terrible white people have been in the past and how they reap the benefits today due to how much they've oppressed in the past. White people have been the privileged group in terms of race, just as men have been in terms of gender. So I am not sure where the race/ethnicity thing connects to this discussion. It typically is just fine to criticize white people..just as it has been in terms of gender. Well, in some cases. On the internet, not so much.


Because it's a double sided argument saying if this scenario happens then it must guarantee this. I'm not talking about privilege, I'm sure there is that but that's a deeper discussion. I was just saying that I thought it was generalizing and black and white. It's fine to discuss that women can be great leaders in power, but imo you also have to look at how men and women are raised to be different and how culture heavily influences peoples beliefs and behavior.
 
Right, but people on this post have agreed with the video, and no one gets mad?? It's funny people get so bent out of shape when I make such a "wild" proposal...

I personally do not take either stance. But people start trippin when I make the opposite suggestion! funny..

I would've said the same things to them were I have read them. It frankly irks me greatly when one gender is pulled in front of the other. Each gender has millions and millions of people to its kind, to generalize all those people is disrespectful.
 

Etbow23

Well-known member
All set aside, I think we can all just conclude that the guy in the video is a nut. I wouldn't take him seriously to be honest.
 

Etbow23

Well-known member
Oh wow people can't respectfully disagree with each other? There is no reason to start attacking, I was just speaking on your argument.

But my argument wasn't that I thought the world would be better off without men, like you said. My argument was looking at how the world would be if women were the predominate leaders. Those are two very different arguments.
 

Etbow23

Well-known member
No it doesn't. It's such a stupid argument. :/

Maybe? I find it fascinating. People may look at it as stupid, but it actually is a very interesting concept: Which gender would be better in leadership positions? Do the masses really believe one gender would be better over the other? American politics says yes at this point in time, I would say. We've had no female president, and when a woman does hold a place of power in politics, she's usually sexualized by the opposing side. It's very interesting.

It's a very interesting discussion to me, but I would say this forum isn't the best place for it.
 

Hellhound

Super Moderator
Hm, if there were only woman leaders around the world, wouldn't the world be more peaceful? Men are the ones who commit like 95% of the murders, rapes, and genocides..and start 100% of the wars...and commit the all of the mass shootings that have been happening..

My president is a woman. Come to my country for about a month or two to be proven wrong.

Women can murder and rape too. Your argument is invalid.
 
Top