I agree that both genders are shallow, and everyone on this forum is shallow to some degree (we all have our standards even when we say we don't)
Definitely, though if you're talking about looks, I think 'taste' is probably a better word than standard, as there is not, and will never be, a universally-agreed scale over what is 'attractive'. I think 'standards' only relate to their personality e.g
I want a partner who'll cook occasionally or something.
It's a superficial world out there, and looks are the first port of call to knowing someone. You know what someone looks like before you know what they're actually like.
Yeah, I think so too. People who feel inclined to be nasty have no other material to work with regarding strangers, so pick on their looks instead. I've even seen extremely attractive people being picked on, though not as often. Usually that's only through jealousy though.
I've actually gained attraction to girls because of their personality and lost attraction in similar fashion to girls who are superficially "hot," as I'm sure all men (and women) have done.
I definitely have. Some of my previous crushes, a couple in particular, when I first saw them... they were the very opposite of my taste and physically I was not attracted to them in the slightest. Then I got to know them and they turned into Gods in my mind.... [here's a grape for you all to go with this cheese].
Well, more fool people who rule potential partners out so fast on the basis that they're not 'attractive enough'. They might be letting something very special slip right by...