ban the word LOL from spw?

ban the word LOL from spw

  • AYE

    Votes: 23 18.9%

  • NO

    Votes: 95 77.9%

  • Ban FOR_REAL from SPW

    Votes: 4 3.3%
  • Total voters
    122
Tiercel

Tiercel

Well-known member
I wouldn't want to ban any lolz.

I'd much prefer a ban on articles, or maybe pronouns. At least then we'd have to really think about what we wanted to say.
 
Pyrophosphate

Pyrophosphate

1
Tiercel said:
I wouldn't want to ban any lolz.

I'd much prefer a ban on articles, or maybe pronouns. At least then we'd have to really think about what we wanted to say.
Click to expand...

Do not ban all articles and pronouns. Sentences would get weird. Pyrophosphate believes Tiercel's idea to ban all articles and pronouns would severely damage clarity of sentences written by posters on SPW. Sentences would become much longer and more redundant. Longer and more redundant sentences are much harder to read than sentences with articles and pronouns. Not having articles leads to strangely formed sentences. Any SPW members reading this post will find this post full of such strangely formed sentences as those strangely formed sentences required to avoid using articles and pronouns.
 
Dead_on_Arrival

Dead_on_Arrival

Well-known member
Pyrophosphate said:
Do not ban all articles and pronouns. Sentences would get weird. Pyrophosphate believes Tiercel's idea to ban all articles and pronouns would severely damage clarity of sentences written by posters on SPW. Sentences would become much longer and more redundant. Longer and more redundant sentences are much harder to read than sentences with articles and pronouns. Not having articles leads to strangely formed sentences. Any SPW members reading this post will find this post full of such strangely formed sentences as those strangely formed sentences required to avoid using articles and pronouns.
Click to expand...

Nice one.......PMSL....lol
 
Tiercel

Tiercel

Well-known member
Pyrophosphate said:
Do not ban all articles and pronouns. Sentences would get weird. Pyrophosphate believes Tiercel's idea to ban all articles and pronouns would severely damage clarity of sentences written by posters on SPW. Sentences would become much longer and more redundant. Longer and more redundant sentences are much harder to read than sentences with articles and pronouns. Not having articles leads to strangely formed sentences. Any SPW members reading this post will find this post full of such strangely formed sentences as those strangely formed sentences required to avoid using articles and pronouns.
Click to expand...

Thank you. :D

Sort of like watching a British period miniseries on PBS, isn't it?

A, it.... So much for my great idea.... :rolleyes:
 
ScaredToBreathe

ScaredToBreathe

Well-known member
no, dont ban it, just dont overuse it. or replace it with something more appropriate like inrlolbictoabts "I'm not really laughing out loud but I couldn't think of anything better to say" :rolleyes:
 
kilojoule

kilojoule

1
tiercel said:
quote:
Originally posted by pyrophosphate
do not ban all articles and pronouns. Sentences would get weird. Pyrophosphate believes tiercel's idea to ban all articles and pronouns would severely damage clarity of sentences written by posters on spw. Sentences would become much longer and more redundant. Longer and more redundant sentences are much harder to read than sentences with articles and pronouns. Not having articles leads to strangely formed sentences. Any spw members reading this post will find this post full of such strangely formed sentences as those strangely formed sentences required to avoid using articles and pronouns

thank you. :d

sort of like watching a british period miniseries on pbs, isn't it?

A, it.... So much for my great idea.... :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

.......lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top