In terms of how it is largely interpreted, yes it is very much b/s. In terms of being able to love yourself before you yourself can receive the love of others? That I do agree with.
you know what's interesting? After reading this post, I've just gained a new perspective on that phrase. Many people misinterpret it and saying it's "bs" because of what they think love is really about. I'm not saying that I completely understand it either, especially when it comes to connecting the word with my own life, but now that you mentioned the word "receive" and putting that into context with "love", it brought me the idea that love isn't something you just "
receive". This brings me to the point that it is not merely a thing you expect to "get" from others, because that is something you can't control and will become almost impossible to "get." This gives new meaning to "Love isn't selfish". Just like how love isn't just a feeling you get. It's something you
act on. It's an action word. It's what you DO, and therefore, what you show, you
give. In order to receive love, you have to give it. So a question one might like to consider asking is: how else can you be able to love others if you don't know how to love yourself in the first place? Or maybe, how else can you demonstrate something that you don't really quite understand yourself?
When they say you need to love yourself, it's basically making a conscious decision to really accept who you are, as a whole and embracing the fact that you may be imperfect but you still value your life enough to become a better person. I think this phrase applies to everyone who may be struggling with self-esteem, depression or who may be trapped in an abusive relationship, as well as people in general who have made the choice not to love because they've given up hope in finding a potential soulmate, etc. :

: