theslowesthand
Banned
Especially if she's fran dresher :inlove:Woo hoo extra marks for a nanny
However, only 1/2 marks for a tranny, right??
Last edited:
Especially if she's fran dresher :inlove:Woo hoo extra marks for a nanny
IMHO a guy should be able to have a few individual friends and that should be sufficient as "social proof" right then and there.
It seems like most people don't agree with me though.. they say that somehow a guy needs a full "social circle" or some kind of "group".. otherwise his social proof fails, and he will probably not be considered attractive.
But like I always say, telling someone with SA or mild autism to get a social network is just very ironic...
Especially if she's fran dresher :inlove:
However, only 1/2 marks for a tranny, right??
Seriously, if it's ok for disabled people to use prostitutes to satisfy their needs, why isn't it ok for anyone else to? Here in Australia, the government even pays for disabled ppl to have sex with prostitutes.
Seriously, if it's ok for disabled people to use prostitutes to satisfy their needs, why isn't it ok for anyone else to? Here in Australia, the government even pays for disabled ppl to have sex with prostitutes.
I find it really depressing that we're creatures that are made to crave things that not everyone will have access to. Seems rather unfair and cruel. Ok rambling done.
Carnal intimacy is only for high quality guys with social proof and some independent-living ability, otherwise go ahead and print out a laminated "ForeverAlone" card.
Not you specifically, but any guy in general who is below par enough. The faster we accept low-status, the better things will be. It's healthy to have a low opinion of yourself, you know?
So disabled men cannot be intimate with women, it's accepted that there is no hope for them? Taken at face value, this would seem to be a very depressing thought, indeed.
What qualifies as disabled enough that the govt will pay you to see prostitutes?
Would being mildly autistic, ADD, socially awkward, with few career prospects (due to social anxiety/low stress threshold).. would that be good enough to ensure I have no hope and they'll pay for my visits to the massage parlor?
Carnal intimacy is only for high quality guys with social proof and some independent-living ability, otherwise go ahead and print out a laminated "ForeverAlone" card.
Not you specifically, but any guy in general who is below par enough. The faster we accept low-status, the better things will be. It's healthy to have a low opinion of yourself, you know?
Carnal intimacy is only for high quality guys with social proof and some independent-living ability, otherwise go ahead and print out a laminated "ForeverAlone" card.
Not you specifically, but any guy in general who is below par enough. The faster we accept low-status, the better things will be. It's healthy to have a low opinion of yourself, you know?
State sponsored prostitution is beyond wrong. It's Orwellian.
State sponsored prostitution is beyond wrong. It's Orwellian.
State sponsored prostitution is beyond wrong. It's Orwellian.
I'm not sure what would qualify someone for that funding. The documentary I watched was about people who had severe disabilities. People who are housebound, cant communicate effectively (in what we would consider a 'normal' sense), and need full time care.
It was a few years ago that I seen that program. The disabled people who were involved were very happy for the human contact. There bodies where messed up but not their minds.
I never said disabled men couldn't be intimate with women or that there was 'no hope for them'.
I think it's a good thing. Imagine being severely disabled all your life (but mentally ok) knowing you'll probably never feel the warm sexual embrace of a woman..
I completely disagree as well.