I've actually seen this kind of discussion before, and it turned into a heated debate where both sides didn't get to have the moral high ground. I also need to add that I personally find the mere concept of ''The moral highground'' a ridicules and pretentious concept.
Almost all living creatures (that we know of) consume other life in order to survive. Plants, for example. Of course, they're not intelligent or have any kind of nerve endings that we know of, but they're still very much alive. Where do we draw the line of what is and isn't morally acceptable? Is it the actual consumption of meat that is the problem, or is it the suffering that is caused in the process of obtaining it?
I am personally not against eating meat. I am strongly against the methods of the meat industry. As humans we look upon death as the worst thing that can happen to us. But death is not the end of everything, it is very much a new beginning for something else. Nature recycles itself quite efficiently in that sense. Humans are no exception in this. I shouldn't have to add that as the human is a animal itself. We tend to forget that. On top of that I also want to add that an animal isn't waiting for it's own demise like we do. They live in the moment. Something we humans can learn something from. Depending on how you do it, the animal needn't be in any kind of physical or mental pain or stress during it's lifetime. I even dare say live a better live then it would in raw nature. Because nature isn't a fairytale funland to live in either. The animal needn't even have it's life drastically shortened either. If it's managed correctly, the animal could live a very long and fulfilling life, and still benefit us as food in the end.
What I'm trying to say is; don't blame to very end of the line, it's a mistake many make. The consumer is a easy target because they're in plain sight, but they're not the ones committing these terrible deeds onto animals. The best you get out of attacking the consumer is a moral war, and that doesn't solve anything for anyone. Not for vegetarians, not for meat eaters, and certainly not for the animals.
You solve a problem by addressing the source; in this case the methods of the (non-organic branch of the) meat industry.