Yea I don't feel those people reacted accordingly.
They aren't the owner of the story. They aren't the writer. It's not their show. They simply watch it. Of course they are entitled to their opinion on it. But these days it seems everyone feel like their opinions matter. Well for the most part, they don't. Opinions are just that - opinions.
I think it reflects poorly on society today when people just can't cope with the ending of a TV show. I think it says more about the people that signed the petition than the tv show itself.
Anyways, that's... just my opinion.
I agree to a certain extent. I don't know what GRRM's intentions as a writer were when he wrote A Song of Ice and Fire, nor D&D's intentions as creators of the tv show. One side of me feels that they are artists and create out of love for the sake of art. The other side tells me that, inherent in that creative act of storytelling--and in fact, inherent in human life--is the want and need to please people--the audience. My guess is that these authors incorporated both instincts.
Why do we create stories? There are a number of reasons: parables to pass down lessons, to make commentary on contemporary problems, to illustrate history, to pass on tradition, and for pure entertainment. Only the good stories last. And whether or not a story is "good" seems to depend on what the audience thinks. Granted, some great stories are branded "terrible" due to political climates at the time of their writing, but I don't think that is the case here. People didn't like S8 because it touched upon some sensitive political subject; rather, the dislike was due to (as expressed by the people that didn't like it) rushed writing, poor execution, and poor ideas in plot and character development.
Maybe the audience is entitled in complaining, if the work is meant solely for the purpose of producing art for the artist's own satisfaction, but I highly doubt that to be the case with these authors (and especially HBO--which I think has some say in the production of GoT... right?).
If the authors' goals--and perhaps "responsibility" is the better word... I mean, isn't the audience in fact,
paying to watch GoT?--are to write compelling storytelling, that is, compelling storytelling for their AUDIENCE, as well as to fulfill their own satisfaction as artists, then the audience should be able to have their say, and the artists should probably listen, since the audience is part and parcel with the act of that storytelling. You cannot tell a good story if there is no one to listen.
What it comes down to, I think, is that the audience had expectations, expectations that had been built up over years. If it's a storyteller's responsibility to tell a good story, especially when expectations have been built over years for a paying audience (again, that audience being part and parcel of the storytelling process), and the artist completely shits on those expectations... well, the audience might just be reasonably upset if they have invested their time, money, and emotion into that story.