I think your rationale is right here, as another person who frequently falls victim to foot-in-the-mouth syndrome, I find it usually is a result of me trying to say something in a more clever or interesting way. Usually, if I feel the need to say something in a more clever or interesting way it also means whatever I am saying usually isn't worth saying and I am trying to puff it up with execution, which in the end actually makes it worse. I think this is especially true when I am beating around the bush. Odds are, if I am beating around the bush I want to say something I should probably keep to myself anyway, otherwise I would come straight out and say it.
I can also think of instances that sound more like Sacrament's case that I think spurn from a different source. I think in conversation we follow scripts a lot, or a template, and in doing so we can see a lot of different things to say that would fit the situation. Only some of these things actually reflect what we feel though, while others are more fitting of others. So in a situation like Sacrament, I could see myself or someone else thinking "well, some people might think she'd have an easier time being approached because her body would signal she's easier. *I* don't think that way though, and wouldn't be the type of person who would say that!" The thought is in your head though, and when you're in the middle of talking and grasping for words you accidentally grab the ones you specifically didn't want to say.
I think in part even that comes to being indirect and beating around the bush. If it was me part of me would think some guys would find her easier because of her weight. It's not a nice thing, but I don't hold a notion that all guys are nice and considerate of others. Obviously I couldn't say that though without telling this person she's overweight, which while probably not a secret is not something people like to hear out loud. So unless I had strong and direct other thought to share, in situations like this my mind would just grab the stray thoughts in my head, many of which end up being unfiltered and better kept to myself.
Great insight vj. Good point about puffing up the execution, when what is being said isn't even anything interesting to begin with. My comment definitely wasn't anything interesting.
Yet, I feel the need to be part of the conversation. So I end up talking about mundane things that no one cares about, and that
I don't even care about. But being absolutely silent is worse...
Most of the time, I don't necessarily want to say anything. But I do feel
obligated to say something for fear that I will be perceived as an outcast, creep, or weirdo if I don't say anything at all. I guess that leads me to talking about things I don't really care about, that I think others might care about or to simply to just fill the void, in order to connect with others. But as you so aptly put (or at least what I think you might have meant), I guess I try to exaggerate the execution of these things
I don't even care about in order to make them more interesting, and by virtue of doing so, end up putting my foot in my mouth. If I talk about something I truly find interesting, it's usually on a topic I know about, which means there is less of a chance of me fumbling for words or trying to put on a display, simply because I find whatever it is that I know about, already extremely interesting.
On your point of a thought being in your head that may represent someone else's belief, but isn't a belief you hold yourself, I think, is very astute. In the moment, we are struggling to form a new coherent thought based on several paradigms, but in our socially anxious ridden mind, the one we choose to spit out just happens to be the one we don't believe, or something close to it. This never happens when I am not nervous, so I am tempted to think that it's attributable to being nervous (which I am in nearly all social situations), or maybe attributable to the pressure of knowing that you are addressing a touchy subject and purposefully trying to avoid saying the wrong thing--which for someone suffering from social anxiety, might be a less straightforward process than it is for a normal person.
I can also think of instances that sound more like Sacrament's case that I think spurn from a different source. I think in conversation we follow scripts a lot, or a template, and in doing so we can see a lot of different things to say that would fit the situation. Only some of these things actually reflect what we feel though, while others are more fitting of others. So in a situation like Sacrament, I could see myself or someone else thinking "well, some people might think she'd have an easier time being approached because her body would signal she's easier. *I* don't think that way though, and wouldn't be the type of person who would say that!" The thought is in your head though, and when you're in the middle of talking and grasping for words you accidentally grab the ones you specifically didn't want to say.
Now a thought just occurred to me as I was writing here (and this relates strongly to your point above vj, but is a slightly different perspective I think): maybe these paradigms of thought that we don't "truly" believe are something that we DO actually consider ourselves. For example, if someone is obviously fat, will I want to tell them that to their face? No. But in my mind, I at least know, factually, that this person's BMI is at an unhealthy level. This thought may come out in conversation for whatever reason, even if I don't intend to offend the person, and I really, ACTUALLY don't want to offend them. So if, while conversing, we are on the topic of obesity, and I know someone in our presence is delicate to that topic, my subconscious belief (I know this person's BMI is at an unhealthy level) may just come out. I might label it as "putting something the wrong way," but is that really the case?
Is it possible that our "foot-in-mouth" instances are merely just Freudian slips? Now that I am truly thinking about this, I may have actually meant a part of the offensive comment that I made earlier. In fact, I definitely did, though I would never have wanted anyone to know that I felt that way. That's not to say my belief was anything malicious. The belief I held was a very brief, passing annoyance at this person, which is completely overshadowed by all of their great qualities. And I never even really thought about this belief; it was just there, minute in my mind and hidden. I definitely like the person in question, but the offending remark concerned ONE, brief instance with this person, and not how I feel about them overall. And now that I think back to other times where I've put my foot in my mouth, many of them have actually come from a subconscious belief that I didn't filter well during conversation. Maybe I just need to figure out a way to filter myself more tactfully.