Yeah, I have a slight problem with this. This whole 'instinct' thing has popped up in many conversations I've been in. We are animals, no doubt, but we have the capacity to resist our basic drives.
Yeah we can resist them, but the feeling of attraction is still there and that feeling cannot be stopped.
Society, although built around man's desire, is in constant conflict with his instinct.
I absolutely agree, and I think this causes lots of problems.
In terms of psychology, many men are drawn towards women who reflect characteristics of their mother;
That's interesting, I think I've heard that before somewhere.
to boil male/female interactions down to purely physical interactions is an insult to humanity as well as slap in the face of those who investigate the psychological interactions between the two genders.
Agreed, and I don't intend to do that. In terms of sexual attraction, the instincts are universal.
But I am always skeptical when people try to over simply these issues, because in reality there is still so much to learn. We have instinct, but we can, and do, resist it.
Yep.
Resisting the instinct of aggression can, in itself, cause psychological problems, but it done so in order for society to function.
Agreed.
We resist our basic human drives all the time.
Of course, otherwise society wouldn't be possible.
And we haven't even taken society's impact on sexuality into account. Human nature (which is widely debated as to its true essence) is another discussion all together. But more to the point,
SickJoke, I think you should accept that this is purely a method to get sex, nothing more.
No, I won't accept that because it's not true. Men need to know how to interact with women whether they want purely sex or a longterm relationship.
I think the problem is that your post comes across as if women are merely sex objects (and I accept your post purely as highlighting ways of getting sex).
I disagree. If you (or anyone, I'm not attacking you) were to do research on social interaction, it would be worded in a similar way as this post. It would have instructions such as "Make eye contact, smile," etc. Does that imply that people are merely social objects? No, it's simply instructions on how to interact.
But you have to accept that it is a form of manipulation, as the girl (I'm guessing) is unaware as to the degree of initial intent when you date her.
No, I won't accept that because it's not true. This isn't manipulation, it's guidelines on how to comfortably interact with, and attract, women.
If you said to her straight out: "I want to f**k you" she'd leave in an instant.
HAHAHA, exactly
It is manipulation, no doubt, as she is completely oblivious to your intent (if not, then sure, she’s aware of what you’re doing, and playing along).
No, she'll be aware. Women are more socially intelligent than men by nature. They know what's going on with the interaction.
The other thing that makes it "immoral' (if you want to call it that) is that the psychological support you give her is not real; the words of support are hollow, as you do not truly mean it (they are merely there to reinforce your pursuit of sex.)
Who says? I didn't instruct anyone to lie.
Sure you can express your opinions, but accept some people will be offended by the nature of your post.
And I might be offended by some of theirs (but don't worry, it takes a lot to offend me, and I haven't been offended yet). Obviously you can't please everyone. Some guys will find this info extremely beneficial.
I don't mean to be judgmental or anything, but accept that the people who criticize your post would obviously be offended if a male did this to them, which is proof in itself.
Not at all. Thanks for the intelligent reply.
