nothingtofear
Well-known member
actually vex, bringing the soul into this discussion without adequately defining it will only bring more confusion... I don't believe in anything metaphysical but I think we've got something like a soul. I like to think of it as an abstract concept rather than something tangible, kind of like an emotional relationship or bond (and not a physical bond!) is a concept that makes sense, I think of a soul as not just being who we are deep down inside but our place in the world as we interact with other "souls" and the nature of our own consciousness and experience and how it interacts with other consciousnesses.
"You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body."
- CS Lewis
That's the simplest most elegant description that I've heard that doesn't contradict popular usage. Most people are extremely vague when they say soul and I imagine a lot of people aren't even totally sure what they themselves mean by it (it's funny because that's not all that uncommon in language). The way CS Lewis puts it, "you" are not a body and a mind, "you" are a soul. If I point at you and say your name and go on to say something, I could be referring to you as an object, like a rock (but not an inanimate object) or I could be talking about the person and there's a difference even if one can't exist without the other much like the mind and the brain are two very different things but for there to be a mind there obviously must be a brain and for there to be the kind of brain we're talking about, there must be a mind. That's how I see the correlation between a soul/person and their physical form. Nothing mystical or impossible, it's merely an abstract but useful way of understanding and perceiving things, much like the extremely abstract nature of both math and language often relate to things that don't exist in any tangible form but they're very useful concepts despite this.
"You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body."
- CS Lewis
That's the simplest most elegant description that I've heard that doesn't contradict popular usage. Most people are extremely vague when they say soul and I imagine a lot of people aren't even totally sure what they themselves mean by it (it's funny because that's not all that uncommon in language). The way CS Lewis puts it, "you" are not a body and a mind, "you" are a soul. If I point at you and say your name and go on to say something, I could be referring to you as an object, like a rock (but not an inanimate object) or I could be talking about the person and there's a difference even if one can't exist without the other much like the mind and the brain are two very different things but for there to be a mind there obviously must be a brain and for there to be the kind of brain we're talking about, there must be a mind. That's how I see the correlation between a soul/person and their physical form. Nothing mystical or impossible, it's merely an abstract but useful way of understanding and perceiving things, much like the extremely abstract nature of both math and language often relate to things that don't exist in any tangible form but they're very useful concepts despite this.