Though I'm not a 100% sure that I understand all what you are saying, I can't help being bugged about the topic of your thread VS your actual post. You wonder "What messages does your life experience tells you" but your answer has nothing to do with your life experience and everything to do with how you perceive yourself in the eyes of others. Now I do think others has lots to do with life but I think there is more to it that you can get.
At the risk of annoying the forum with my perceived inane negativity. The reason I dont adopt a similar attitude to coyote's (with all due respect) is because I see it as a form of complacency or perhaps indifference. Sure it feels bad - but it also feels good because you are allowing your true feelings to be expressed.
I think its OK to feel like you have been treated unfairly - I think its OK to try and do something about it and to kick up a fuss, within the confines of what is rational... because then things might change....and they have changed before, but its also about being honest with yourself.
People dont seem to be particularly sympathetic on this forum and I think its because people think that they arent trying hard enough, perhaps in some cases maybe, but unless you have lived there life you dont know what it feels like to be them - and I think its a naive attitude to assume that just because you have more resilience then everyone else must do as well.
I will never adopt the attitude of "what will be will be" - its not me and I dont think it works. I think the reason why my philosophy makes people feel uncomfortable is because it makes people feel responsible for others - and that there is an implication that things are 'hopeless' which is not what I am saying at all.
I think there is more to it than viewing yourself by how others treat you or react to you, but seriously, even if we know rationally that our self-worth shouldn't be based on these things, it still leaves the question of how to find that worth from within rather than from these external things. My life experiences tell me that I'm unlikeable because few have ever wanted to be my friend, much less date me, and that I'm a failure professionally because despite college degrees, no one will even interview me, and frustratingly I'm not even meeting up to the standards at my minimum wage jobs, though I am trying. I suppose our sense of self, and self-esteem, should have come from our parents/care givers when we were babies/children, but what if your parents were harsh, or even just indifferent, and looking to peers for assurance and affirmation just left you rejected, teased, picked on and ignored?
I may be misinterpreting what you're saying, but my take on what I think you are saying is this:
We do formulate opinions and generalizations about the world based on what we see and the information that others present to us. However, people tend to process only those bits of information that align with what makes sense to them, and not those other bits of information that contradict. In the case of someone who thinks Asians are bad drivers, they are going to have that notion reinforced every time they encounter a bad Asian driver. But they aren't going to count all the times they see a good Asian driver (which they probably wouldn't notice anyway), or a bad driver of another nationality.
It is similar to the technique used by psychics, televangelists, etc. They throw out several possibilities---some are "hits", and some are "misses". The success of this method depends on the human tendency to discount those misses, and only give value to the "hits."
As for self-esteem and negativity, I think the same idea applies. If you are told enough times by different people that you are worthless or stupid or whatever, then you are going to tend to believe it, in spite of the fact that there are many more people who are NOT telling you those things, and maybe even some people who are telling you the exact opposite. But it's easy to believe those people who are dragging you down because some part of you wants to believe it, or because it's easier to rationalize those ideas about yourself.
I notice many people who say over and over that they have really bad luck in life. I don't believe that for a minute. They think that because they got into a fender bender or have a toothache or an illness, that they are unlucky. But they are discounting the hundreds or thousands of days when they weren't in a car accident, or didn't die in a freak accident, or when circumstances just happened to fall into place so that they actually ended up getting something they wanted or having a nice day. It's impossible to process all those intangible positives, and much easier to focus on the tangible negatives---but it doesn't make those positives any less real.
I consider myself a positive person simply because I choose to acknowledge that there are more good things in my life than bad. I don't know how I ended up as a positive person, since I grew up around very negative and judgmental people. Maybe it is in my nature, or maybe something has happened to me later in life to allow me to see things in a positive light. I don't know.
I may be misinterpreting what you're saying, but my take on what I think you are saying is this:
We do formulate opinions and generalizations about the world based on what we see and the information that others present to us. However, people tend to process only those bits of information that align with what makes sense to them, and not those other bits of information that contradict.
autism spectrum disorder. That´s all, no conditioning.
And/or sensitive to criticism?