Circumcision...

[Sacrament]

Your welcome, enjoy your mutilated penis

It's "you're", and I bet my 'mutilated penis' is way healthier than yours.

Let me know when your foreskin gets all floppy from all the stretching and you need to get rid of it again.

And also, this so called restoration won't bring back all the essential nerve endings you had before you chopped it off.

Your views are wrong, but you'll figure it out eventually, I'm sure. If not, I'm sorry.

 

[Thelema]

I've only skimmed a few posts, but circumcision is, by definition, mutilation.

It's a weird barbaric cultural practice that should die out.

The foreskin protects the head of the penis. The head was never meant to be calloused and exposed. It lessens sexual sensation and the foreskin is supposed to increase the stimulation for the woman as well.

 

[DaaaBulls]

Restoration is becoming a common practice and dates back thousands of years. Obviously you cannot get back what was taken from you because of circumcision but you can get back a lot. Just having the head covered makes it worth it to me. And I have grown around a centimeter or two in about a month and a half. I expect to have full coverage in a year to a year and a half. 30 minutes a night is a small price to pay for having protection of the head for the rest of my life.

Sacrament- You keep on telling me that my views are wrong but you do not say why. I have explained my side of the story but your posts are spell checks and "wrong"s. How is my view point wrong? Because I feel that circumcision is wrong and unecessary I am wrong? Since starting to restore I have been able to achieve a full erection, where as when I was circumsized I could only get 95% erect. That isn't natural. The only time I have ever had premature ejaculation was after I got circumsized. Would you cut off your eye lid? The eye lid does the same thing for the eye that the foreskin did for the head of the penis. I am hoping for an inteligent response but I doubt I will get one.

 

[Remus]

It's "you're", and I bet my 'mutilated penis' is way healthier than yours.

I'm afraid you are wrong, he got it right the first time, it's "your"

"you're" means "you are"

 

[Remus]

Sacrament- You keep on telling me that my views are wrong but you do not say why.

He likes to get a "rise" out of people, he argues for arguments sake and makes snipey comments, moderators keep warning him about this, this is why you both got banned the other week. He wound you up and then you took it out on me.

 

[DaaaBulls]

He likes to get a "rise" out of people, he argues for arguments sake and makes snipey comments, moderators keep warning him about this, this is why you both got banned the other week. He wound you up and then you took it out on me.

Remus- You're right (See Sacrament I do know how to write! Who woulda thought an English major would know how to do such a thing?) But seriously, didn't mean to get on you.

 

[Sacrament]

I'm afraid you are wrong, he got it right the first time, it's "your"

"you're" means "you are"

I didn't know SPW grammar was different from the rest of the world's. He said "your welcome", "your" being possessive case. My welcome? I see.

And yeah, it's still "you're welcome", and you're wrong as well, grammar-wise. You must be the only person in the world who doesn't say "you are welcome."

Restoration is becoming a common practice and dates back thousands of years. Obviously you cannot get back what was taken from you because of circumcision but you can get back a lot. Just having the head covered makes it worth it to me. And I have grown around a centimeter or two in about a month and a half. I expect to have full coverage in a year to a year and a half. 30 minutes a night is a small price to pay for having protection of the head for the rest of my life.

Sacrament- You keep on telling me that my views are wrong but you do not say why. I have explained my side of the story but your posts are spell checks and "wrong"s. How is my view point wrong? Because I feel that circumcision is wrong and unecessary I am wrong? Since starting to restore I have been able to achieve a full erection, where as when I was circumsized I could only get 95% erect. That isn't natural. The only time I have ever had premature ejaculation was after I got circumsized. Would you cut off your eye lid? The eye lid does the same thing for the eye that the foreskin did for the head of the penis. I am hoping for an inteligent response but I doubt I will get one.

I already gave you my reasons for being against your point of view plenty of times throughout this thread, based on my experience before and after being circumcized. I find it unbelievable that you can say something like "circumcision is never necessary" and be serious about it. Again, and like I said before, just because pulling the foreskin is working for you doesn't mean it'll be like that for everyone. What do you think doctors do? They go straight to surgery without even ONCE suggesting that? It's one of the first things they tell the mother when the baby's born. Phimosis is not just "oh boohoo my foreskin is tight, let's cut it off." It can be a serious condition that cannot be fixed manually.

You seem to ignore most of what I say and simply say all those things based on your bad experience with circumcision and believing in things you've read or heard that don't make much sense.

Having been circumcised was one of the best things I ever had the guts to do. I'm sorry it wasn't the same for you.

 

[DaaaBulls]

Sacrament-

Why do you care so much whether people spell every single word right? Do you type out your responses on word and spell check them before you post? Give me a break.

As for the surgery, no I was never told that manual stretching was an option for phimosis. I was told that circumcision was the only answer. By more than one doctor.

I don't ignore anything you say, actually I pay really close attention. You were circumsized at birth, had phimosis on your eye lid, and had another circumcision on your eye. See I was paying attention the whole time. And how is phimosis a "serious" condition if I might ask? Phimosis has absolutely no effect on the flaccid state of the penis so you are fine to urinate and move around. When you get an erection the skin doesn't go fully over the head. How is that a serious condition? Outside of not being able to have the best sex in the world there is nothing serious about it. Unless your talking about something else wrong with your penis other then phimosis liek maybe phimosis on a micro-penis?

 

[Sacrament]

Are you seriously saying that there's nothing wrong in not being able to expose the glans? Nothing wrong in having the possibility of having sex or doing something of the sort and ripping it out into a bloody mess? Among other inconveniences, one of which being the accumulation of smegma under the foreskin, which is gross.

It's frustrating to argue with you because I don't even know what to expect.

 

[Remus]

This thread is getting abit pointless now, closed till further notice