LittleMissMuffet
Well-known member
I have a theory about the way that human behaviour and personality is. This theory is that socially anxious people are 'extroverted introverts'. I use this term because I intentionally want to imply that we (the socially anxious) are two extremes in the one. That, all people are a make-up of two different aspects (call them, the yin and yang, or anima and animus -whatever...) and that just as a person is never completely one way, all people have different elements.
This decription, 'extroverted introverts', is a correct one for the following reasons...
-all people have different sides, whilst some are more introverted and others more extroverted, all in fact have elements of both
- the more extreme an individual is in one way (eg, extroverted) the more they are also the other (eg, introverted); only, the first is the dominant side of their personality whilst the second is non-dominant (eg: have you ever observed people and noticed how some 'highly extroverted' types were actually described as 'very shy' in their past. This is what I am getting at when I describe how a person with more extreme characteristics is actually a dual mix of two extremes.
- just as the 'feminine' is seen as lower than the 'masculine', 'introversion' is also, generally, regarded as lower than 'extroversion'
-yet, both the masculine and the feminine are always equally present
-also, this description of the highly shy, sensitive and anxious, as being 'extroverted introverts', fits with a lack of adaptability towards extroverted people and and extroverted world. 'Extroversion' is regarded as 'better' and as 'right', whilst the feminine characteristic of 'introversion' is regarded as 'wrong' and 'weak' ....but before I offend any males, the point here, you see, is that where there is one there is always the other.
-in fact, it is seeing one as superior to the other that I believe is the poor belief/perspective that lies behind 'social phobia'
-just as, an inability to adapt to the other way of being that is not dominant to the individual's way of being, (eg; adapting to extroversion when you're dominantly introverted) is to be lacking in a balance between two different polar sides, that goes with seeing and thinking that 'extroversion' is superior to 'introverstion' -and, because these two are actually equal just as they are equally present, unconciously a person also regards the opposite as true: ie: that introversion is superior to extroversion (IOWs, thinking your self lesser goes with thinking your self more important)
I'll stop there and see if anyone has any interest in what on earth I'm goinf on about.
This decription, 'extroverted introverts', is a correct one for the following reasons...
-all people have different sides, whilst some are more introverted and others more extroverted, all in fact have elements of both
- the more extreme an individual is in one way (eg, extroverted) the more they are also the other (eg, introverted); only, the first is the dominant side of their personality whilst the second is non-dominant (eg: have you ever observed people and noticed how some 'highly extroverted' types were actually described as 'very shy' in their past. This is what I am getting at when I describe how a person with more extreme characteristics is actually a dual mix of two extremes.
- just as the 'feminine' is seen as lower than the 'masculine', 'introversion' is also, generally, regarded as lower than 'extroversion'
-yet, both the masculine and the feminine are always equally present
-also, this description of the highly shy, sensitive and anxious, as being 'extroverted introverts', fits with a lack of adaptability towards extroverted people and and extroverted world. 'Extroversion' is regarded as 'better' and as 'right', whilst the feminine characteristic of 'introversion' is regarded as 'wrong' and 'weak' ....but before I offend any males, the point here, you see, is that where there is one there is always the other.
-in fact, it is seeing one as superior to the other that I believe is the poor belief/perspective that lies behind 'social phobia'
-just as, an inability to adapt to the other way of being that is not dominant to the individual's way of being, (eg; adapting to extroversion when you're dominantly introverted) is to be lacking in a balance between two different polar sides, that goes with seeing and thinking that 'extroversion' is superior to 'introverstion' -and, because these two are actually equal just as they are equally present, unconciously a person also regards the opposite as true: ie: that introversion is superior to extroversion (IOWs, thinking your self lesser goes with thinking your self more important)
I'll stop there and see if anyone has any interest in what on earth I'm goinf on about.