This seems like an important conversation. But there seem to be two clearly defined sides to the argument.
One side is trying really, really valiantly to find the goodness in life, and try to find reasons to make life worth living. A lot of it makes sense, and to a normal person it would seem totally believable and rational.
The other side can't hear any of it. That's my impression from all this. No matter how much you try and convince someone of the goodness and happiness in living, if they don't want to believe it, they won't. And they'll go on being miserable forever, or worse.
Many of you are trying so desperately to get people to fight back, to resist the emotions and the hopelessness and despair, the self-loathing and the emptiness that so many of us have felt. And for some, it might even get through and a hopeful few might turn their lives around and look back on this time as merely an obstacle they had to overcome. But I do not see the majority of people who wish to die early, and young, and full of hate and pain and sadness having any desire at all to change the path they've wrought for themselves.
It seems to me like a morally hopeless argument, to try and convince someone in this kind of state that things really aren't so bad and all you have to do is change your attitude and then things will get better. These people have lost all faith in everything, it seems to me, and no amount of cajoling or persuasion is going to change that.
As for me, my own personal misery is total and all-encompassing, so much so that I've become anhedonic. I see the logic and rationality of the counter-arguments, but I still cannot agree. Something in me more powerful than the logic centers of my brain simply prevents that from happening. I am sure it is much the same for many of the rest of you. So what do we do?
That, is the real question, and none of us will find answers outside of ourselves.