I'm a professional software developer and I have a B.A. in philosophy. I do what I do because I like doing it. Maybe if I studied to become an accountant I could live a miserable life and buy a hummer, but I prefer to work for myself doing what I want to do.
If you consider my life "boring" and want to be a pimp with lots of bling or something, have fun. But don't whine to me about how terribly impoverished you are, and you sure as hell shouldn't expect any sympathy or bailout from me when your extravagent lifestyle and lack of self-control puts you in debt.
your crappy apartment doesn't cut it.
It's a very comfortable place in a fantastic, beautiful little town. Summer noise can be annoying, but not living in heaven isn't the same as being a poor suffering oppressed "under attack" person.
Maybe you need more than an old clunker to get you back and forth.
Nobody requires a car. A car is a luxury. I do enjoy that luxury. And it's got less than 50K miles on it, and hasn't stranded me anywhere yet, so I wouldn't call it a clunker. (My old one was, admittedly, but I upgraded.)
There are many situations where you might temporarily get some debt and guess what, maybe at the same time you lose your job. What then?
Then you're not the people the thread or the book is about, since it clearly states it's about two income middle class famlies. However, as far as "what then", you sell all your valuable property -- you don't ask taxpayers to pay your $5000/month mortgage so you can keep your mansion.
There is an actual social class called the working poor and it's a very descriptive term-they work and they're poor.
You've completely stopped attempting to stay on topic, and you seem to just hope I won't notice that your only good points are when you're talking about completely different people than the thread is about -- in fact, you're talking about the very people who I've been saying deserve the sympathy, the actual poor, not the middle class. So in your attempt at slight of hand your points are right but your logic is screwed up -- your points work against your argument.
You have a degree in philosophy? You should get your money back because it didn't do you any good. Let's get back on topic.
The rate of inflation the past 11 years
Historical Inflation data from 1914 to the present
The pay hasn't kept up with the cost
"According to the US Census Bureau, the median is "considerably lower than the average, and provides a more accurate representation.""
Household income in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Looking at the full cycle across economic peak years—a more useful measure in evaluating economic performance—reveals that household income was no higher in 2007 than in 2000, the previous peak. Given rising joblessness and declining real wages, next year’s numbers will certainly be worse.
Comparisons between 2000 and 2007 reveal:
* Median income fell further for working-age households than for all households because job and wage growth was particularly weak in the 2000s relative to past cycles (see Figure 2)."
Median income rose as did poverty in 2007; 2000s have been extremely weak for living standards of most households
Oh, no, I guess your broad brush finger pointing doesn't stack up reality : "Even more surprising to Warren were the causes of this financial breakdown, which she assumed would implicate the battered culprit of overconsumption of luxury goods. "I thought I would write a story about too many trips to the mall, too many $200 sneakers, too many Gameboys," says Warren.
But stacks of government data on consumer spending, which she combed through as a Radcliffe Institute Fellow in 2002, proved her hunch wrong. Compared with a generation ago, she found, today's middle-class families earn about 75 percent more (all figures are adjusted for inflation), thanks in large part to Mom's entrance into the work force. But after shelling out for four fixed expenses - mortgage, health insurance, child care or education, and car payments - today's median-income family has less left over, in inflation-adjusted dollars, than the single-income family of the 1970s.
"Families are not going broke over lattes," Warren quips. "Families are going broke over mortgages."
Harvard Gazette: Middle-class income doesn't buy middle-class lifestyle
Present your evidence that the prices of goods aren't going up and that the income of middle class people is keeping up with the price increases that you don't think exist; excluding the recession.