LilMissTragic said:
if they don't meet my moral standards- then maybe I will just have to influence them into being better...
What the hell are you talking about???
Mostly I just went off on a tangent that didn't directly relate to the original post. Oh, well, just started examining myself I reckon. Stupid me.
morals

f or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior.
I used that term in a very loose sense.
Just meant standards in general. But some people who may not meet my moral standard may be someone who tends to jump to conclusions, which in alot of cases tends to be overly confident people who come to the conclusion that they are smarter or better than other people when in fact that they are probably just normally average people with inflated self-esteems. I generally find that those sorta people unjustly hurt other people.
In anycase, maybe I should have touched on all basis moral or not. As far as influencing people... generally I find that alot of people go around on a self righteous kick, condemning anyone who do not meet their mold of perfection. Have I inflated this danger because of my SA? Yep.
Also, I can't say that I've never been immune to any of this myself, but now I am just saying that if I don't want to be condemned because of my imperfections then I shouldn't do the same towards other people.
Also people in general instead of being accepting of people who don't meet their standards moral or not (I'm not necessarily refering to religious morals) tend to either condemn people- which only results in people becoming defensive or shunning them. I think a better solution is educate people and influence them in a positive manner. But of course there are some people who should be condemned,- hitler, rapists, etc.
And no, I don't think I am better than anyone else.
grrr.. what the hell are you talking about missy?